The problem
The solution
Direct sale of music by download
Custom- production of music CDs to order
Music sites that have adopted these business models or similar ones
|
|
A New Model for the Recording Industry
-
The Problem: RIAA wants to invade your
privacy,
while performers complain that music companies don't pay them the
royalties
to which they are entitled.
-
The Cure: business models that will allow
performers
and customers to bypass the music companies entirely.
- Music Sites that have adopted similar business
models: where to buy music online and bypass RIAA and retail
markups. "New Ways to Pay 99 Cents for Music," Wall Street Journal, 9 October
2003, page D1 shows these business models are becoming reality
This is the disease
Congressman Wants to Let Entertainment
Industry
Get Into Your Computer
(26 July 2002, Associated Press, on
Foxnews.com) WASHINGTON — A proposal by a California congressman
would
give the entertainment industry broad new powers to try to stop people
from downloading pirated music and movies off the Internet.
Rep. Howard L. Berman, D-Calif., formally proposed legislation
that
would give the industry unprecedented new authority to secretly hack
into
consumers' computers or knock them off-line entirely if they are caught
downloading copyrighted material.
...The head of the Recording Industry Association of America,
Hilary
Rosen, called the Berman bill an "innovative approach to combating the
serious problem of Internet piracy."
"Rockers vs. Bean Counters," by Jennifer
Ordonez.
Wall
Street Journal, 24 September 2002, B1
"Musicians say music companies unfairly cut into their royalties,
which
are a percentage of their album sales, by improperly accounting for
some
expenses."
"Musicians say there is no incentive for record companies to report
royalties correctly the first time because there are no penalties for
underreporting."
The article points out that the Recording Industriy Association of
America
(RIAA) is "the record companies' lobbying arm."
This is the cure
The queen did not like it much. Not that she felt any
personal
interest in the matter, but she thought it disrespectful to Sir Breuse
Sance Pite. However, I assured her that if he found he couldn't stand
it
I would fix him so that he could.
Mark Twain, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's
Court
If the entertainment industry cannot stand not being able to invade
people's
privacy and violate the Fourth Amendment of our country's Constitution,
I will similarly fix the entertainment industry so it can-- by
proposing
a highly viable business model that will make the existing
entertainment
industry irrelevent. It will do so the old-fashioned American
way,
through innovation and free-market competition. Customers will need the
old-order music recording companies about as much as people needed the
horse-and-buggy industry after Henry Ford (the real-world equivalent of
Mark Twain's Connecticut Yankee) made automobiles affordable to the
middle
classes.
One of the following three alternative systems for distributing
recorded
music could easily become a very profitable business. Since the
existing
recording and entertainment industry has seen fit to threaten the
privacy
of individual Americans, I am providing the following information as a
public service. If someone wants to catch this ball and run with it, I
would appreciate credit for the original idea (and my letter to the
editor
in the Wall Street Journal in early 2002 will back me up on
this),
but otherwise this information may be used freely.
Meanwhile, remember that used music CDs (and videocassettes) can
be
bought and sold on E-bay without
infringing
on anyone's copyright.
Comparison of Four Business Models
Supply chain legend:
Industrious ant: a value-adding activity, one for which
the customer should
be willing to pay
Useless parasite: a non-value-adding activity that
provides no value to
the customer. Note that each one that is eliminated means more
value
for the customer and more profit for each "industrious ant" in the
supply
chain.
Some
non-value-adding activities, like shipping, are necessary.
Elimination
of a non-value-adding entity from the supply chain
Note that, in each of the three alternative business
models,
-
The recording industry no longer acts as a gatekeeper to determine
whose
music gets published. This will benefit less-well-known artists.
-
Furthermore, the musicians will make more money.
-
The customer picks the songs or soundtracks that he/she wants. The
ability
to customize the order will result in more sales.
Existing system (recording and
entertainment industry)
Musicians
create a recording, includes a fair royalty or profit for the music
artists
"Burning"
and packaging the CD (or cassette tape), including a fair profit for
this
value-adding activity only
Recording
industry overhead and profit
Distributor's
overhead and profits
Retailer's
overhead (store rent), inventory carrying costs, and profits |
E-Commerce Model, direct download (e.g. RebelArtist)
Musicians
create a recording
E-commerce
hosting ("electronic storefront")
Recording
industry overhead and profit
Distributor's
overhead and profits
Retailer's
overhead (store rent), inventory carrying costs, and profits
|
E-Commerce Model, produce and ship on
demand*
(iUniverse.com
model)
Musicians
create a recording
"Burning"
and packaging the CD (or cassette tape)
Shipping
Recording
industry overhead and profit
Distributor's
overhead and profits
Retailer's
overhead (store rent), inventory carrying costs, and profits |
Retail outlet produce-on-demand model*
Musicians
create a recording
"Burning"
and packaging the CD (or cassette tape)
Since the "factory" is located on the retailer's premises, the
retailer's
overhead (at least the part assignable to this activity) can be
considered
necessary to the value-adding activity.
Recording
industry overhead and profit
Distributor's
overhead and profits
Retailer's
inventory carrying costs |
* These two business models can serve the large market segment that
does
not have access to high-speed Internet access. It is not convenient to
download the content of an entire CD via modem.
Existing E-commerce Model: RebelArtist.com
RebelArtist.com allows artists to sell clip art and
photographs
through a Web site. The Web site displays a thumbnail sketch and a
larger
but watermarked preview image. To download the actual image, you must
pay
the price that the artist sets for the image. The artist receives a
very
large share of the sale price.
At present, the recording industry can act as a gatekeeper to
musicians.
The recording industry decides whose music gets published and whose
doesn't.
The recording industry (and the distribution chain) takes a huge share
of the music CD's bloated sale price. Why should people have to pay $17
or $18 for a music CD that costs perhaps a couple of dollars (including
labor and capital) to "burn?" They shouldn't, but the solution has
nothing
to do with piracy. It has everything to do with lean enterprise: the
principle
that, to use Henry Ford's terms, must either produce or get out. If it
doesn't add value it's waste.
The RebelArtist business model can be extended to music very
easily.
The musicians put their soundtracks online, and a Web site allows
customers
to listen to short excerpts (or a full track of noticibly lower quality
than the actual music). Customers could then buy individual
soundtracks,
download them, and "burn" them onto CDs for further listening. They
could
also download a CD label image, and a jacket image for insertion into a
jewel case.
Note the additional advantage: the customer could buy the
soundtracks
that he/she wanted, instead of having to take an entire CD that might
include
material that he/she doesn't want. The ability to customize the
order would doubtlessly increase sales.
This does not defeat the piracy problem but, at perhaps half a
dollar
per song, the incentive to commit piracy would be much lower. Suppose
that
a typical music CD contains ten songs of five minutes each. It would
cost
$5.00 to download all of them. The artists might get $3.00 and the
E-commerce
site $2.00. I don't know how much the artists get in the way of
royalties
from the recording industry, but $3.00 on a $15.00 (retail) CD would be
20 percent.
Next we have the Ford economic driving model. Elimination of
waste--
in this case, the recording companies, distributors, and retailers--
from
the supply chain lowers the price (as shown above) and
increases
the sales volume. The artists not only make at least as much money
from each sale as they did under the old model, they sell far more
material.
This is exactly what Ford did with the Model T. The artists can go
through
an E-commerce intermediary as described above, or even sell soundtracks
off their own Web sites.
Another model, for those
who
don't want to do it themselves
There are still plenty of people who can't or don't want to
"burn" their own CDs. Note that modem connections are not convenient
for
downloading the equivalent of a music CD, and these two business models
deal with this consideration.
-
Order by Internet (iUniverse.com
model,
prints books when they're ordered instead of doing long print runs)
-
The customer orders the music (specifying, as above, the songs or
soundtracks).
The manufacturer "burns" a CD, labels it, and packages it in a jewel
case
with appropriate labeling. Example: 50 cents per song plus $3.00 to
make
and package the CD. The final price is half what you'd pay in a retail
store.
-
In-store produce-on-demand
-
Here's one for BestBuy and Circuit City. You can't stock every possible
selection a customer might want-- but you could set up a make-to-order
CD burner as shown above. Set up a few kiosks in which customers can
listen
to selections (as described above) and enter orders. This also lets you
clear a lot of inventory out of your store; you don't have to carry
the inventory, and you can use the floor space for something else.
Music Sites that have adopted similar business
models
|