|
|
Corporate Statement on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Offset Trading
Adopted 24 April, 2007
Due to the widening controversy over
greenhouse gas emissions, and proposals for carbon taxes and mandatory caps on
these emissions, the Company adopts the following official policy.
It is the official position of Levinson Productivity
Systems P.C. that carbon emission caps, carbon taxes, and carbon offset trading
are contrary to the interests of American consumers and workers, and the economic
welfare and national security of the United States as a whole. Good business
and engineering practices, which seek to minimize energy costs per unit of
product or service, already have the incidental effect of reducing carbon
emissions. The Company accordingly adopts the following Seven Points with
regard to greenhouse gas emissions:
- Manufacturing
is the backbone of national prosperity and national security. Our country's
standard of living, ability to make good on its Social Security commitments to
retirees, and military power rely on manufacturing. Anything that undermines
the United States' manufacturing base must therefore be regarded as a clear and
present danger to our national security, as well as to our standard of living.
- Intelligent
management (lean manufacturing, Toyota production system) can reduce per-unit
labor costs to the point where access to cheap labor should not be a
consideration in deciding where to build a factory. The best engineering on
earth cannot abolish laws of thermodynamics that define the minimum amount of
energy that is required to make steel, aluminum, and most chemical products.
- Factories,
power plants, and vehicles have an ethical and often legal duty to control
emissions that are harmful to human, animal, and plant life. Carbon dioxide
does not qualify as such an emission, so its regulation has no identifiable
employee safety or public health benefits.
- Although
carbon dioxide emissions may play a role in trapping or absorbing sunlight:
- The preponderance of global warming is almost
certainly due to unavoidable climate cycles. These include both Ice Ages (New
York's Finger Lakes were created by glaciers) and warm periods that encouraged
Viking settlements in Greenland.
- Regulation of carbon dioxide emissions by the
United States will do nothing to reduce atmospheric concentrations of this gas as
long as countries like China have no plans or obligations to implement similar
regulations. It will, by raising energy costs, encourage manufacturers to move
their smokestacks, and all the carbon dioxide and manufacturing jobs that go
with them, to China.
- The Company further notes that South American
countries that are among the Kyoto Treaty's most vocal advocates are burning
down rain forests (carbon sinks) to clear land for development.
- Real
wealth comes from exactly three activities: mining, agriculture, and
manufacturing. It does not come from trading carbon offset credits, coins,
comic books, stamps, baseball cards, and other collectibles.
- Carbon offset trading also creates widespread
opportunities for frauds and scams at the expense of credulous consumers and
even businesses. It has, in fact, been compared to the medieval scam of selling
indulgences for people's sins.
- Proposed
carbon cap-and-trade mandates would reward their corporate advocates for
implementing existing business plans, "not raising hogs," or forcing
consumers and businesses to buy their products or services.
- A
proposed ban on incandescent light bulbs seems to benefit only companies that
manufacture fluorescent lights that, in our experience, are far less friendly to
the human eye than incandescent bulbs.
- The Company's position is that these
corporations should earn money the old-fashioned way: by getting the cost of
their "green" products down to where an engineering economic analysis
yields a positive Net Present Value for purchasing them. For reference,

where P is the
original cash outlay at time 0, Ak is the net benefit
(savings or income minus costs) in the kth time period, and i is the buyer's
required rate of return on investments. (Salvage value, which is generally
negligible, is ignored.) The Company encourages sellers of so-called
"green" products to get P low enough, and/or A high enough, so people
and businesses will buy them voluntarily.
- The
Company supports and encourages efficiency improvements and resource recycling
that, while their primary purpose and effect is to reduce operating costs, have
the incidental effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions per unit of product
or service.
[End of official position statement]
Additional Thoughts
Supporters of carbon taxes, carbon emission trading, and so on are encouraged to remember two stories.
- In Aesop's fable of the mice who voted to put a bell on the
cat so they would know it was coming, all the mice thought it was a
wonderful idea until the quesiton came up as to who was to put the bell
on the cat.
- To prove the limitations of what kings and governments can
do, King Canute sat by the seashore and ordered the tide not to come
in. Needless to say, he was soon soaked by the incoming tide.
Greenhouse gas regulations are likely to be about as effective, noting
that most global warming is probably due to solar warming (that is also
affecting Mars).
- Persia's King Xerxes order that heavy seas receive three
hundred lashes for destroying his bridge across the Bosporus was
equally unrelated to the waters' eventually becoming calm.
Fluorescent Lighting: Our Experience So Far
While we resent corporations that are agitating for legislation to ban
incandescent lamps (thus forcing people to buy the fluorescent lights
they manufacture--see the above commentary on making money the
old-fashioned way), we were initially delighted to see "full spectrum"
fluorescent lights that offer to pay for themselves manyfold over their
lifetimes. We bought a couple to see how they would work out, but the
results have been disappointing so far. The "full spectrum" light from
the 60 watt equivalent bulb seems much harsher than that of a
"daylight" incandescent bulb, and certainly harsher than that of the
rare-earth full-spectrum bulbs from Chromilux. The 25 watt-equivalent
bulb, while drawing only 7 watts, appears to flicker. Our
experience to date is therefore that these CFLs are suitable for
incidental lighting--and we are delighted to save on electicity by
using them for that purpose--but not for reading and desk work.
Excessive Carbon Emissions are a Symptom, not a Disease
Carbon emissions, while a largely unavoidable (in the absence of
hydroelectric or nuclear power sources) byproduct of manufacturing and
transportation, are also an indicator of resource consumption and
therefore costs. An excessive "carbon footprint" per unit of product is
a symptom of waste (muda). On the other hand, it may be more to
the point to assess energy usage directly, noting that even energy from
non-fossil fuel sources represents a cost. We would no more waste
solar, nuclear, hydroelectric, or wind power than we would waste power
from a coal-fired generator. In summary:
- Excessive carbon emissions per unit of product are
symptomatic of underlying waste (muda) in its production. This is why
use of carbon emissions as a performance indicator can indeed reduce
supply chain costs.
- The same kinds of waste can, however, exist in
carbon-neutral systems. We therefore prefer to focus on energy streams
as opposed to carbon. If we take care of the energy streams, the carbon
(if present) will take care of itself.
|