Husaria wingLevinson Productivity Systems, P.C.
William A. Levinson, P.E.  Principal
570-824-1986
TheBoss at ct-yankee.com
Lean Enterprise
Six Sigma
Books
Resume
Stochos products
ISO 9000
SPC
The Man Factory
3rd Party Resources
Home


Corporate Statement on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Offset Trading

Adopted 24 April, 2007
Due to the widening controversy over greenhouse gas emissions, and proposals for carbon taxes and mandatory caps on these emissions, the Company adopts the following official policy.
 
It is the official position of Levinson Productivity Systems P.C. that carbon emission caps, carbon taxes, and carbon offset trading are contrary to the interests of American consumers and workers, and the economic welfare and national security of the United States as a whole. Good business and engineering practices, which seek to minimize energy costs per unit of product or service, already have the incidental effect of reducing carbon emissions. The Company accordingly adopts the following Seven Points with regard to greenhouse gas emissions:
  1. Manufacturing is the backbone of national prosperity and national security. Our country's standard of living, ability to make good on its Social Security commitments to retirees, and military power rely on manufacturing. Anything that undermines the United States' manufacturing base must therefore be regarded as a clear and present danger to our national security, as well as to our standard of living.
  2. Intelligent management (lean manufacturing, Toyota production system) can reduce per-unit labor costs to the point where access to cheap labor should not be a consideration in deciding where to build a factory. The best engineering on earth cannot abolish laws of thermodynamics that define the minimum amount of energy that is required to make steel, aluminum, and most chemical products.
  3. Factories, power plants, and vehicles have an ethical and often legal duty to control emissions that are harmful to human, animal, and plant life. Carbon dioxide does not qualify as such an emission, so its regulation has no identifiable employee safety or public health benefits.
  4. Although carbon dioxide emissions may play a role in trapping or absorbing sunlight:
    • The preponderance of global warming is almost certainly due to unavoidable climate cycles. These include both Ice Ages (New York's Finger Lakes were created by glaciers) and warm periods that encouraged Viking settlements in Greenland.
    • Regulation of carbon dioxide emissions by the United States will do nothing to reduce atmospheric concentrations of this gas as long as countries like China have no plans or obligations to implement similar regulations. It will, by raising energy costs, encourage manufacturers to move their smokestacks, and all the carbon dioxide and manufacturing jobs that go with them, to China.
    • The Company further notes that South American countries that are among the Kyoto Treaty's most vocal advocates are burning down rain forests (carbon sinks) to clear land for development.
  5. Real wealth comes from exactly three activities: mining, agriculture, and manufacturing. It does not come from trading carbon offset credits, coins, comic books, stamps, baseball cards, and other collectibles.
    • Carbon offset trading also creates widespread opportunities for frauds and scams at the expense of credulous consumers and even businesses. It has, in fact, been compared to the medieval scam of selling indulgences for people's sins.
  6. Proposed carbon cap-and-trade mandates would reward their corporate advocates for implementing existing business plans, "not raising hogs," or forcing consumers and businesses to buy their products or services.
    • A proposed ban on incandescent light bulbs seems to benefit only companies that manufacture fluorescent lights that, in our experience, are far less friendly to the human eye than incandescent bulbs.
    • The Company's position is that these corporations should earn money the old-fashioned way: by getting the cost of their "green" products down to where an engineering economic analysis yields a positive Net Present Value for purchasing them. For reference,

where P is the original cash outlay at time 0, Ak is the net benefit (savings or income minus costs) in the kth time period, and i is the buyer's required rate of return on investments. (Salvage value, which is generally negligible, is ignored.) The Company encourages sellers of so-called "green" products to get P low enough, and/or A high enough, so people and businesses will buy them voluntarily.
  1. The Company supports and encourages efficiency improvements and resource recycling that, while their primary purpose and effect is to reduce operating costs, have the incidental effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions per unit of product or service.
[End of official position statement]


Additional Thoughts
Supporters of carbon taxes, carbon emission trading, and so on are encouraged to remember two stories.
  1. In Aesop's fable of the mice who voted to put a bell on the cat so they would know it was coming, all the mice thought it was a wonderful idea until the quesiton came up as to who was to put the bell on the cat.
  2. To prove the limitations of what kings and governments can do, King Canute sat by the seashore and ordered the tide not to come in. Needless to say, he was soon soaked by the incoming tide. Greenhouse gas regulations are likely to be about as effective, noting that most global warming is probably due to solar warming (that is also affecting Mars).
    • Persia's King Xerxes order that heavy seas receive three hundred lashes for destroying his bridge across the Bosporus was equally unrelated to the waters' eventually becoming calm.
Fluorescent Lighting: Our Experience So Far
While we resent corporations that are agitating for legislation to ban incandescent lamps (thus forcing people to buy the fluorescent lights they manufacture--see the above commentary on making money the old-fashioned way), we were initially delighted to see "full spectrum" fluorescent lights that offer to pay for themselves manyfold over their lifetimes. We bought a couple to see how they would work out, but the results have been disappointing so far. The "full spectrum" light from the 60 watt equivalent bulb seems much harsher than that of a "daylight" incandescent bulb, and certainly harsher than that of the rare-earth full-spectrum bulbs from Chromilux. The 25 watt-equivalent bulb, while drawing only 7 watts, appears to flicker. Our experience to date is therefore that these CFLs are suitable for incidental lighting--and we are delighted to save on electicity by using them for that purpose--but not for reading and desk work.

Excessive Carbon Emissions are a Symptom, not a Disease
Carbon emissions, while a largely unavoidable (in the absence of hydroelectric or nuclear power sources) byproduct of manufacturing and transportation, are also an indicator of  resource consumption and therefore costs. An excessive "carbon footprint" per unit of product is a symptom of waste (muda). On the other hand, it may be more to the point to assess energy usage directly, noting that even energy from non-fossil fuel sources represents a cost. We would no more waste solar, nuclear, hydroelectric, or wind power than we would waste power from a coal-fired generator. In summary:
  1. Excessive carbon emissions per unit of product are symptomatic of underlying waste (muda) in its production. This is why use of carbon emissions as a performance indicator can indeed reduce supply chain costs.
  2. The same kinds of waste can, however, exist in carbon-neutral systems. We therefore prefer to focus on energy streams as opposed to carbon. If we take care of the energy streams, the carbon (if present) will take care of itself.

visitors since 24 April 2007